Friday, March 15, 2013
Jeez, he has only been in office 2 days
And the Vatican is already defending Francis the Talking Pope against charges that he was complicit in the Argentine Dirty War.
For the first time since the election of Pope Francis two days ago, the Vatican on Friday formally defended him from accusations that, decades ago, in the so-called Dirty War in his home country of Argentina, he knew about serious human rights abuses but failed to do enough to halt them.For those of us old enough to remember, the defense sounds very similar to those used to defend Pope Pius XII of charges of collusion with the Nazis during WW II. And the situation is similar, a high church official having to deal with a brutal dictatorship that controls his environment. And just as with Pius XII, we will never really know what he thought and how much he did, good or bad.
The Rev. Federico Lombardi, the Vatican spokesman, said there had “never been a credible accusation against him” relating to the period in the 1970s when he was the superior of the Jesuit order in Argentina.
Indeed, “there have been many declarations of how much he did for many people to protect them from the military dictatorship,” Father Lombardi said in a statement at a news conference.
“The accusations belong to the use of a historical-social analysis of facts for many years by the anticlerical left to attack the church and must be rejected decisively.”...
But the question of his past has never been far below the surface, rekindling accusations relating to a conflict in which as many as 30,000 people were disappeared, tortured or killed by the dictatorship.
At the news conference on Friday, Father Lombardi repeated assertions by a prominent human rights campaigner that there had been “no compromise by Cardinal Bergoglio with the dictatorship.”
The debate has simmered in Argentina, with journalists there publishing articles and books that appear to contradict Cardinal Bergoglio’s account of his actions. These accounts draw not only on documents from the period, but also on statements by priests and lay workers who clashed with Cardinal Bergoglio.
Comments:
<< Home
Yeah, I was initially over optimistic, hearing he was a Jesuit. All the Jesuits I ever have known were into Liberation Theology....and that gave me some hope the Church might wake to the real world. It figures they find the ONE FUCKING Jesuit who is NOT a liberation theologist, and who may have sold out those who were. :-(
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]
Post a Comment