Tuesday, January 27, 2015
The graphic posted below references Wal-Mart & Sheryl Crow
Specifically the lyrics of this song, "Love Is A Good Thing" which so pissed off Wal-Mart they refused to sell it. But it is hard to refuse the idea of the song which is 19 years old and still fresh.
And may Gawd bless my trust fund
First they screwed people out of their houses
And when people had to live in their cars, they decided to screw people out of their cars. And they get to use the same fraudulent tricks they used on the homes.
The loans were for used Dodges, Nissans and Chevrolets, many with tens of thousands of miles on the odometer, some more than a decade old.Standard & Poor just paid a multi million dollar fine because the shit they rated as triple A wasn't anywhere close to it. And now we have them doing the same thing with something that sheds value faster that a Republican sheds rwsponsibility. And the shit peddlers want us to believe their crap is safer than Treasuries? Be much better off buying yourself a bridge.
They were also one of the hottest investments around.
So many asset managers clamored for a piece of a September bond deal made up of these loans that the size of the offering was increased 35 percent, to $1.35 billion. Even then, Santander Consumer USA received more than $1 billion in investor demand that it could not accommodate.
Across the country, there is a booming business in lending to the working poor — those Americans with impaired credit who need cars to get to work. But this market is as much about Wall Street’s perpetual demand for high returns as it is about used cars. An influx of investor money is making more loans possible, but all that money may also be enabling excessive risk-taking that could have repercussions throughout the financial system, analysts and regulators caution.
In a kind of alchemy that Wall Street has previously performed with mortgages, thousands of subprime auto loans are bundled together and sold as securities to investors, including mutual funds, insurance companies and hedge funds. By slicing and dicing the securities, any losses if borrowers default can be contained, in theory.
Led by companies like Santander Consumer; GM Financial, General Motors’ lending unit; and Exeter Finance, an arm of the Blackstone Group, such securitizations have grown 302 percent, to $20.2 billion since 2010, according to Thomson Reuters IFR Markets. And even as rising delinquencies and other signs of stress in the market emerged last year, subprime securitizations increased 28 percent from 2013.
The returns are substantial in a time of low interest rates. In the case of the Santander Consumer bond offering in September, which is backed by loans on more than 84,000 vehicles, some of the highest-rated notes yield more than twice as much as certain Treasury securities, but are just as safe, according to ratings firms.
Can't buy a snow day
If you are one of the low wage service personnel that most people don't even notice as they go about their daily lives, chances are you have to go to work when the snow flies, you can't afford not to.
As the snow piled up on Hillside Avenue, Navarrete thought about her imminent commute. She works nights, 8 p.m. to 1 a.m., as a hotel maid on Long Island, about 25 miles east. She drives 60 minutes each way — much longer in the snow — for just $8.50 per hour, 25 cents below the state minimum wage.This article was about New York area workers, who dodged a bullet when the storm veered away from the City. The workers in the Boston-Providence region aren't so lucky.
“I have to go to work,” Navarrete said, reassured that Blanco, a landscaper, could stay with the baby overnight. “My boss is making me work tonight and tomorrow night. If I didn’t go in, I would lose my job.”
In the region affected by the storm, over 577,000 workers labor at or below the minimum wage (PDF). They are overrepresented in the service sector and thus unlikely to get a paid snow day — maids, nannies, home health aides, taxi drivers, fast-food cooks, grocery store stockers and janitors, to name a few. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, these employees rarely enjoy flexibility on the job. Nationally, only 20 percent of low-wage workers (in the bottom tenth of private-sector earners) enjoy paid sick leave. And only 39 percent have paid vacation, let alone personal days.
A massive disruption like a blizzard hits low-wage employees hardest, said Amy Traub, senior policy analyst at liberal think tank Demos. “There is no working from home if you’re a sales associate or if you’re a cashier. If they can’t get to work because of weather, you miss a paycheck. If the store closes early or works with a skeleton staff, you miss a paycheck.”
Some states and municipalities battling the storm — Massachusetts, Connecticut, New York City and Jersey City, N.J. — require employers to provide paid time off. But laws typically do not apply to very small businesses; nor do they cover missed work due to lack of child care or a shutdown in public transit. “There’s no recourse if [the boss] says, ‘Come here or you’re fired,’ unless you have a union contract,” Traub said.
It's a two edged problem
On the one hand, federal offices and agencies supposed to enforce laws against child abuse are failing quite badly. On the other hand, the full extent of the failure isn't known because of confidentiality laws set up to protect the children, although they now protect the failures.
The federal government's failure to enforce the nation's child protection laws is a "national disgrace" that leaves abused children vulnerable to future harm, according to a three-year study by two child advocacy groups.Anyway you look at it, the children lose.
The 110-page report released Tuesday identified some of the same failures reported in December by The Associated Press after an eight-month investigation into the cases of hundreds of children who died of abuse or neglect in plain view of child protection authorities.
"Our laws are weak. We don't invest in solutions. Federal laws aren't enforced. And courts are turning their backs. This creates a trifecta of inertia and neglect," said Amy Harfeld, policy director at the Children's Advocacy Institute at the University of San Diego School of Law, which wrote the report with the nonprofit group First Star.
AP's investigation, published Dec. 18, also revealed a system in crisis, hobbled by weak federal oversight, budget constraints, worker shortages and a voluntary data collection system so flawed that nobody can say with accuracy how many children die from abuse or neglect each year.
The AP found that at least 786 children died of abuse and neglect over a six-year span — many of them beaten, starved or left alone to drown — while agencies had good reason to know they were in danger. That figure represents the most comprehensive statistics publicly available, but the actual number who died even as authorities were investigating their families or providing some form of protective services is likely much higher because antiquated confidentiality laws allow many states to withhold vital information, shrouding their failures.
The federal government estimates an average of about 1,650 children have died annually from abuse or neglect in recent years, whether or not they were known to the child welfare system, but many experts believe the actual number is twice as high. And many more suffer from near-fatal abuse and neglect every year.
"Almost everything that happens to these children is cloaked in endemic secrecy, and most efforts by the media and advocates to provide the public with much needed transparency — which leads to accountability — are thwarted by the very governmental entities and officials who have turned their backs on their official duties to children," the groups said.
No profit in that old Crow
Monday, January 26, 2015
If she breaks your heart she can fix it too
Folk singer songwriter Suzie Brown has an excellent day job if needed, she is a cardiologist. While she waits for your heart to break you can listen to her sing "Heartstrings" from her album of the same name.
PS SuZie Brown is not to be confused with the more commercial SuSie Brown.
Science and the Republican
Tom Tomorrow shows us how the Republicans are protecting us from a tsunami of scientific research with a wall of obtuse totally ungrounded in reality.
The Republican Jobs Plan
Law designed to help now turned to abuse
Once upon a time they passed a law designed to protect people unable to manage their own affairs because of age, injury or illness. The law gives nursing homes a right to sue for guardianship of patients. Originally designed to help those who no longer had anyone to protect their interests, nursing homes are now turning it into a means of debt collection regardless of family wishes.
Guardianship transfers a person’s legal rights to make some or all decisions to someone appointed by the court — usually a lawyer paid with the ward’s money. It is aimed at protecting people unable to manage their affairs because of incapacity, and who lack effective help without court action. Legally, it can supplant a power of attorney and a health care proxy.Getting old is Hell and there is always some son of a bitch somewhere trying to make it worse.
Although it is a drastic measure, nursing home lawyers argue that using guardianship to secure payment for care is better than suing an incapacitated resident who cannot respond...
A court evaluator eventually reported that Mr. Palermo was the appropriate guardian, and questioned why the petition had been filed. But the matter still dragged on, and Mr. Palermo, who had promised to pay any arrears once Medicaid completed a recalculation of the bill, grew distraught as his expenses fighting the case reached $10,000.
In the end, Medicaid’s recalculation put his wife’s monthly copay at $4,558.54, almost $600 less than the nursing home had claimed, but still far more than the $2,642 Mr. Palermo had been paying under an earlier Medicaid calculation. As soon as the nursing home cashed his check for the outstanding balance, it withdrew the guardianship petition.
“They chose to use a strong-arm method, asking for somebody to be appointed to take over her funds, hoping for a rubber stamp to do their wishes,” said Elliott Polland, Mr. Palermo’s lawyer.
Many judges go along with such petitions, according to lawyers and others involved in the process. One judge who has not is Alexander W. Hunter Jr., a longtime State Supreme Court justice in the Bronx and Manhattan. In guardianship cases in 2006 and 2007, Justice Hunter ordered the nursing homes to bear the legal costs, ruling they had brought the petitions solely for the purpose of being paid and stating that this was not the Legislature’s intent when it enacted the statute, known as Article 81 of the Mental Hygiene Law...
New York’s guardianship statute was part of a national movement to limit guardianships to the least restrictive alternatives necessary to prevent harm. A petition is supposed to be brought only by someone with the person’s welfare at heart, and guardianship is to be tailored to individual needs, taking into account the person’s wishes.
Continue reading the main story
Instead, Ms. Callahan said, “it has become a system that’s very focused on finances.”
Boner parrots Bibi
It's not every day that you hear the Speaker of the House, next in line after the Vice President, parroting the dreadfully stale talking points of a rogue state leader in defense of an indefensible invitation to that rogue leader, but that is exactly what John Boehner did on Sunday night.
House Speaker John Boehner Sunday defended his invitation to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to address Congress in March, saying that President Barack Obama is ignoring threats posed by Iran and terrorists.There is a certain demented symmetry in one of the greatest threats to the integrity of the United States inviting one of the greatest threats to the Middle East to Capital Hill for tea and biscuits. Unfortunately their end is to get more American servicemen killed for their warped power dreams.
In a joint interview with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., on CBS’ ‘60 Minutes,’ Boehner accused Obama of barely discussing terrorism in his State of the Union speech last Tuesday.
‘The president didn’t spend but a few seconds talking about the threat, the terrorist threat that we as Americans face,’ Boehner, R-Ohio, said. ‘This problem is growing all over the world. And you know, the president is trying to act like it’s not there. But it is there.’
Boehner said he wants Netanyahu to speak to Congress because ‘there’s nobody in the world who can talk about the threat of radical terrorism, nobody (who) can talk about the threat that the Iranians pose, not just to the Middle East and to Israel…but to the entire world, but Bibi Netanyahu.’
Boehner announced his Netanyahu invite after Obama, in his State of the Union speech, repeated his call for Congress not to impose new sanctions against Iran as negotiators continue talks on its nuclear program. Lawmakers are teeing up measures to impose new sanctions on Iran or require congressional approval for any nuclear deal struck with the Tehran government.
‘Under the proposal we’re considering those enhanced sanctions would only occur if a deal is not reached,’ McConnell said. ‘In other words, it further incentivizes the Iranians to reach an agreement because they know things could get considerably worse if they do not.’
Today's lesson in Economics
Sunday, January 25, 2015
She was no one hit wonder
But few people know Dorothy Moore for anything other than her 1976 hit "Misty Blue"
Deflation - It's Not Just For Money Anymore
R.I.P. Joe Franklin
Another New York landmark gone.
On television, Mr. Franklin did not like to rehearse, and he never used cue cards or prompters. The opening monologue and the questions were all in his head.Well Done!
“I was the only guy who never had a preproduction meeting,” Mr. Franklin said in 2002. “You don’t rehearse your dinner conversation. I’m not saying I was right, but I lasted 43 years.”
Not all Republicans are butt-stupid
Try as they might to keep feeding red meat to a mindless howling mob moving at the direction of its wealthy shepherds, sometimes they have to actually do what is right. A few of the Republican governors are facing the reality that they can only impose so much failure on their states and now must increase taxes to maintain a functioning state.
Republican governors across the nation are proposing tax increases — and backing off pledges to cut taxes — as they strike a decidedly un-Republican pose in the face of budget shortfalls and pent-up demands from constituents after years of budget cuts.True that many of the tax increases are regressive and add further abuse to those least able to carry it, some few of the Republican overlords do see the hazard of the anarchy that will follow total defunding of government. And they are doing so at the beginning of their terms, counting on that paragon of short attention span, the voter, to forget by the next election.
“My jaw dropped,” Assemblywoman Michele Fiore, a conservative Republican in Nevada, said after hearing Gov. Brian Sandoval, a Republican, propose a $1.1 billion tax increase for education this month. “Whether we kill it by five votes or 15 votes or 25 votes, we are going to kill it.”
At least eight Republican governors have ventured into this once forbidden territory: There are proposals for raising the sales tax in Michigan, a tax on e-cigarettes in Utah, and gas taxes in South Carolina and South Dakota, to name a few. In Arizona, the new Republican governor has put off, in the face of a $1 billion budget shortfall, a campaign promise to eliminate the unpopular income tax there.
“It’s not based on partisanship; it’s based on common sense and good government,” said Gov. Rick Snyder of Michigan, a Republican who has urged voters to support a ballot measure that would raise $1.9 billion by increasing the sales tax and gas tax. “We’ve been underinvesting in Michigan for some time, so I view it as a way to, long term, save us resources.”
They go where we send them
Saturday, January 24, 2015
A Norwegian Band on a Dutch radio show
And singing in English, Katzenjammer less one this day sings "Old de Spain" from their new album Rockland
Snowflake Snooki Palin Eat Your Heart Out
How's that Hispanic outreach going?
Two years after that verminous RNC Chairman Rinse Prewash declared that the Republicans needed to rebrand to be attractive to Hispanics, the GOP has reverted to its exclusionary ways. And this may lead to their losing a most important Hispanic news anchor, Jorge Ramos.
For years, Mr. Ramos largely aimed his ire at President Obama for breaking his 2008 campaign promise — made directly to Mr. Ramos — that he would propose an overhaul of the nation’s immigration system in his first year in office, and for deporting two million people since. Even after Mr. Obama announced late last year that nearly half of the estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants could apply to work without fear of deportation, Mr. Ramos confronted him during a Nashville forum for having “destroyed many families” by not acting sooner.The Teabagger wing of the Republican Party can't help themselves. For all that they may rationally understand the need for Hispanic voters, they are driven by their hates and will pull down the rest of the party rather than let go of their reason for being.
But Mr. Ramos’s focus has changed, he said in an interview here: “Now is the turn of Republicans.”
This weekend, the Spanish-language Univision, and Fusion, its English-language venture with ABC News, will cover the first gathering of 2016 Republican presidential aspirants, at a conservative forum in Des Moines on Saturday organized by Representative Steve King of Iowa. Mr. King, an immigration hard-liner, is well known to Latinos for remarks like one claiming that most young border-crossers have “calves the size of cantaloupes because they’re hauling 75 pounds of marijuana.”
That coverage follows Mr. Ramos’s in-depth reporting last week of House Republicans’ vote to block Mr. Obama’s immigration orders and deport up to four million people, mainly so-called Dreamers brought to the United States as children and the parents of American citizens. Given Republicans’ immigration stance, Mr. Ramos expects to cover more such stories through 2016.
And that has some Republicans worried.
“Remember what L.B.J. said, ‘When you lose Walter Cronkite, you’ve lost the war’?” said Matthew Dowd, a campaign adviser to George W. Bush, recalling the oft-cited if disputed story that President Lyndon B. Johnson said he lost “middle America” when Cronkite turned against the Vietnam War. Among Latino voters, Mr. Ramos has the sort of influence and audience that Cronkite had more broadly among Americans in his day.
Mr. Ramos is “not only a journalist, he’s become the voice of the Latino constituency,” Mr. Dowd said. “And that’s where Republicans have to worry — you don’t want to lose Jorge Ramos.”
How Republicans are perceived among Latinos mattered little in the midterm elections last year, when the party won control of both chambers of Congress for the first time in Mr. Obama’s presidency. Turnout of Latinos and other minority voters was, as usual, much lower than for presidential elections, and most close contests were in places with few Latinos.
Continue reading the main story
But in 2016, the Republican record will matter. Mitt Romney, the 2012 Republican presidential nominee, who said during the campaign that undocumented residents should “self-deport” — a position he defended in an interview last November on Univision — got only 27 percent of Latinos’ votes. Republican strategists say their 2016 nominee must get more than 40 percent to win. The last Republican candidate to do so was Mr. Bush, who had supported a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants.
Early signs in both the Republican-run Congress and the presidential nomination race suggest how far Republicans have veered from the immigration course recommended two years ago when the party, at Mr. Priebus’s direction, produced an autopsy of Republicans’ 2012 losses that concluded that they must do more to engage Latino voters and propose “positive solutions on immigration.”
With the best of intentions
Another of the roads to Hell has been paved, this time with mosquito nets. In ares of Africa where malaria is a major problem, well intentioned foreign donors have sent mosquito nets to protect people while they sleep at night. Unfortunately these same people view hunger as a greater threat to their lives than malaria. And now they have these beautifully made nets that sweep up everything.
Out here on the endless swamps, a harsh truth has been passed down from generation to generation: There is no fear but the fear of hunger.The fine mesh netting leaves nothing behind, no food, no babys not even their eggs, unlike a proper fishing net. And when everything is fished out, they will still suffer from malaria and add starvation to their problems. All thanks to the best of intentions.
With that always weighing on his mind, Mwewa Ndefi gets up at dawn, just as the first orange rays of sun are beginning to spear through the papyrus reeds, and starts to unclump a mosquito net.
Nets like his are widely considered a magic bullet against malaria — one of the cheapest and most effective ways to stop a disease that kills at least half a million Africans each year. But Mr. Ndefi and countless others are not using their mosquito nets as global health experts have intended.
Nobody in his hut, including his seven children, sleeps under a net at night. Instead, Mr. Ndefi has taken his family’s supply of anti-malaria nets and sewn them together into a gigantic sieve that he uses to drag the bottom of the swamp ponds, sweeping up all sorts of life: baby catfish, banded tilapia, tiny mouthbrooders, orange fish eggs, water bugs and the occasional green frog.
“I know it’s not right,” Mr. Ndefi said, “but without these nets, we wouldn’t eat.”
Across Africa, from the mud flats of Nigeria to the coral reefs off Mozambique, mosquito-net fishing is a growing problem, an unintended consequence of one of the biggest and most celebrated public health campaigns in recent years.
The nets have helped save millions of lives, but scientists worry about the collateral damage: Africa’s fish.
R.I.P. Ernie Banks
The Pride of the Cubs and optimistic to the end.
Billionaire Buyers Guide to 2016
Bill Maher gives us a rundown all the current GOP candidates.
Wisdom from the Notorious R.B.G.
Friday, January 23, 2015
Another one of those Canadian singers
The ones they keep hidden lest they be stolen away. Jenn Grant singing "Trailer Park" from her new album Compostela
Oklahoma said he was OK
About that Veterans Suicide Bill
Now that Old Dr.No, Tom Coburn is no longer in the Senate, there appears to be no one who will block the passage of this bill to prevent veteran suicides. This does not mean that the Republican/Teabaggers won't find a way to render the bill worthless. When needed they can always fall back on their tried and true standby, not funding the bill.
A bill to reduce suicides among veterans stalled in the Senate last month despite its heartrending cause and strong bipartisan support. Now it’s on the verge of final passage thanks to the departure of its main critic.Wasting $Billions on the F-35 and the Little Crappy Ships but cheaping out on $22Million for veterans. The heart and soul of the Republican/Teabaggers.
Veterans were infuriated in December when retiring Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., used parliamentary tactics to single-handedly block a vote on the legislation, citing cost concerns. Projected to cost $22 million over five years, the bill includes language that explicitly prohibits the authorization of any additional funds to carry out its provisions.
Still, supporters of the legislation – among them Republican Sens. Jerry Moran of Kansas and Roy Blunt of Missouri – say extra funds aren’t necessary to consolidate and improve the Department of Veterans Affairs’ suicide prevention programs. They expect the bill to get another shot at final passage in the Senate in the coming days. This time, they say, it will pass easily.
Blunt says it shouldn’t be hard for VA to shift resources around and find the necessary savings within its existing budget to pay for the bill.
“Twenty-two million over five years means $4.4 million over every year,” Blunt said Wednesday in a press call with Missouri reporters. “The department has a lot of money. They proved last year that they were not spending that money wisely.”
One of the pilot programs would repay the student loans of psychiatrists who commit to at least two years of service with VA, while the other would create partnerships between VA medical centers and nonprofit community groups to establish support networks for veterans.
Another provision of the bill would extend the eligibility of combat veterans who were discharged between 2009 and 2011, enabling them to qualify for VA medical services and nursing home care even if they haven’t proven that their illnesses are linked to their military service.
Is Ben Carson the Black Joni Ernst?
Thursday, January 22, 2015
Lydia Loveless has moved from the country she grew up playing and found the raw edge of her style in "Really Want To See You Again" from her latest album Somewhere Else.
Perhaps when they grow up
Canadian pipeline profits vs American Family Farms
The Keystone XL pipeline struggle can be boiled down to those two simple points in the headline. And if one looks carefully, it is not hard to see that the "All-'Murican" Republican Party has fallen on the side of Canadian profits, a portion of which will flow to some of said Republicans. On the other hand those farmers in the affected ares are banding together to do what they can to save their family farms.
The pipeline project has become a cause célèbre, and not just among conservatives, who cite its potential to create jobs, or among environmentalists, who lament the risks they say it poses to groundwater. Several farmers like the Harringtons are also in a personal battle to protect land that in many cases has been passed down through generations.And now they are facing new state laws that make it easier for a foreign company to take American farms by eminent domain for their private profit. A gross misuse of a legal principle supposed to support the common good. And about what you can expect any time you elect Republicans.
This week TransCanada, the company proposing the pipeline, began eminent domain proceedings in Nebraska county courts, seeking to gain access to almost 90 properties where the owners have not agreed to terms. Many of those landowners have said they have no intention of allowing construction.
“Imagining all those big earthmovers coming in and digging this big scar down our heritage just feels wrong,” said Terri Harrington, the sister who owns a plot where the pipeline would run. She worries that a leak — like one that sent 50,000 gallons of oil into the Yellowstone River in Montana last week, contaminating drinking water — could endanger the land she loves.
The Harrington farm, divided among the sisters years ago but still in many ways managed as a single unit, sits amid the quiet, flat farmland of southeast Nebraska, miles from the nearest town. Corn and soybeans are the main crops here, and they grow in abundance largely because of the Ogallala Aquifer, the underground water source farmers depend on for irrigation.
As children, the Harringtons rose early to do their chores, and as teens, some of them caught a tan while driving the tractor wearing a swimsuit. Terri Harrington moved to Denver after college and became a lawyer, but the other sisters stayed in Nebraska and made their careers in agriculture...
Jenni Harrington said she had not been a political activist before the Keystone XL proposal, but after watching a video of oil sands extraction in Alberta, where the 1,179-mile Keystone XL route would start, she began speaking out.
“Having to be forced to have that run through our property just seemed like a really wrong thing, and we couldn’t stay quiet,” said Ms. Harrington, who has testified about the issue at local government meetings and has written postcards to President Obama expressing her opposition.
Though the vast majority of Nebraska landowners along the route have agreed to terms with TransCanada, the well-organized 12 percent who have not signed on make this state the emotional heart of anti-pipeline activism.
But it's so easy
Measuring success in any conflict can be very difficult, even years after the shooting has stopped. However, as we live in an age that demands everything instantly, body counts are often provided by the military as markers of progress to an all to often undelineated success. The US, at the urging of The Big Bean Counter Robert McNamara, relied on body counts during the Vietnam War, and successfully proved that they were meaningless as a measure. Nowadays, the US military swears on a stack of M-4s that they don't use it, but don't believe them.
Since the Vietnam War, with its gruesome and inflated U.S. tallies of enemy dead, the Pentagon has denied keeping body counts. But, in fact, the military does add up the number of enemy fighters it believes it has killed — and proudly boasts of the totals in official documents that it never intends for public circulation.They are easy, require no explanation and warm the hearts of bean counters everywhere. How can you not use the only metric that everybody understands?
The disconnect over wartime body counts reflects a yawning gap between the military’s public face and its private culture.
As early as the 19th century, Prussian military theorist Carl von Clausewitz warned that counting enemy dead was a misleading measure of an army’s effectiveness, to say nothing of a war’s soundness. “Casualty reports,” Clausewitz wrote,“… are never accurate.”
A body count is “no accurate measure of the loss of morale,” the celebrated military theorist emphasized. “The abandonment of the fight remains the only authentic proof of victory.”
In other words, no one really knows how many of your enemy you need to kill to compel the remaining forces to surrender...
Eleven years after Fallujah, the Pentagon has again suppressed any officer’s impulse to publicly mention an official body count. Hence Kirby’s insistence on Jan. 6 that adding up the dead is “not the goal.”
In reality, the body counts have merely gone underground, so to speak. Spokespersons deny tallying the dead. But the official annual histories of various military commands continue to trumpet high body counts.
Bibi, our shadow Secretary of State
We may elect a President and let him choose a Secretary of State, with the consent of our elected Senators, but the real hand on our Middle East foreign policy would appear to be Benjamin "Bugsy" Netayahu Prime Minister of Israel and unindicted war criminal.
It might be that Bugsy is overplaying his hand in this one. The President can still deport unwanted aliens.
“I know what America is,” Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told Israeli settlers in 2002 in a hot-mic moment captured on video by Israel’s Channel 10. “America is a thing you can move very easily, move it in the right direction.”
That’s a proposition House Speaker John Boehner plans to test on March 3, when he presents the Israeli leader to a joint session of the House and Senate in the expectation that Netanyahu will give full-throated support to a congressional effort to overrule the Obama administration’s Iran policy.
Boehner may be counting on Netanyahu’s popularity across the partisan divide to help Republicans attract enough support for new sanctions on Iran to override the veto promised by President Barack Obama. And there are certainly a number of Democrats pushing for new sanctions despite the administration’s warning that such a move would torpedo prospects for a diplomatic solution to the nuclear standoff.
The decision to bring in a foreign leader to weigh in against the president on what Obama has defined as an issue of war and peace was taken by a Republican leadership and an Israeli head of state. The Republicans were looking to use a new congressional majority to challenge the lame-duck president, and the Israeli leader wanted to continue his own, relentless battle against nuclear compromise with Tehran. Neither party, according to Haaretz, bothered to tell the White House as they forged the plan.
“The typical protocol would suggest that the leader of a country would contact the leader of another country when he’s traveling there,” said White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest on Wednesday. “This particular event seems to be a departure from that protocol.”
It would hardly be the first time Netanyahu has tried to change U.S. policy by going around the White House and appealing directly to Congress to take a harder line on Iran. He did the same to President Bill Clinton when Newt Gingrich was Speaker of the House in 1996, and to Obama in May 2011.
Netanyahu has consistently played the spoiler in nuclear negotiations with Iran, even though his hard line position on diplomacy with Iran has drawn frequent rebukes from Israel’s security chiefs over the years. Indeed, Bloomberg reported late Wednesday that Israel’s Mossad intelligence service had broken ranks with Netanyahu’s effort to press for further sanctions, and was warning U.S. officials and lawmakers that such a move would destroy efforts to find a diplomatic solution to the Iran standoff. (Update: The Mossad on Thursday, via a statement released by Netanyahu's office, denied it had opposed new sanctions on Iran.)
A new rising GOP star
Wednesday, January 21, 2015
A Mississippi Blues Woman and her Piano
Eden Brent singing the title song from her 2014 album "Jigsaw Heart"
A holy tabernacle for his god
From the Dept. of No-Shit Sherlock
Despite the continuing use of torture for the pleasure and enjoyment of W, Dickwahd and the other Busheviks, the CIA has known for some time that the value of any intelligence gained by torture if grossly overblown.
The internal report, more than 1,000 pages in length, came to be known as the Panetta Review after Leon E. Panetta, who, as the C.I.A.’s director, ordered that it be done in 2009. At least one of its authors won an agency award for her work, according to a recent briefing that the agency’s inspector general gave to staff members of the Senate Intelligence Committee.Sadly, with the Republicans in control of Congress, we can expect a renewal of torture by the CIA. Torture having been accepted as a new Republican core value, any hint of its lack of effectiveness is to be expunged along with any mention of official criminality.
The contents of the Panetta Review, which remain classified, are now central to simmering battles over the Intelligence Committee’s conclusions about the efficacy of torture and the C.I.A.’s allegations that committee staffers improperly took the review from an agency facility. The C.I.A. has publicly distanced itself from the report’s findings, saying that it was an incomplete and cursory review of documents, and has blocked its release under the Freedom of Information Act...
The internal C.I.A. review ordered by Mr. Panetta was an attempt by the agency to better understand millions of documents that the C.I.A. was handing over to the committee as it began its investigation into the Bush-era detention program.
The result of the internal review, led by Peter Clement, who at the time was the agency’s deputy director of intelligence for analytic programs, was a series of memos on what the documents revealed about the internal workings of the program.
One of the report’s findings, according to people who have seen the document, was that the C.I.A. repeatedly claimed that important intelligence to thwart terror plots and track down Qaeda operatives had come from the interrogation sessions of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed when, in fact, the intelligence had other origins.
The C.I.A. has long maintained that the interrogation of Mr. Mohammed, a chief planner of the Sept. 11 attacks, was central to disrupting a number of terror plots, including Qaeda plans to attack the West Coast. Mr. Mohammed was one of the C.I.A. detainees subjected to the most brutal interrogation methods, including waterboarding.
Now we know what to expect
As the allies of the Keystone pipeline continues to push for approval of their meal ticket, the people who will be exposed to whatever happens to the pipeline can get a foretaste of what to expect when it bursts. And it will burst and spill multiple times during its lifetime.
When an oil pipeline burst in July 2011 and poured 63,000 gallons of crude into the Yellowstone River 200 miles upstream from Dena Hoff’s farm of wheat, beans and corn on the Great Plains in Glendive, she felt disgusted.Safety is a relative thing with a pipeline. Certainly spilling 50-60,000 gallons of crude each year does not make it unsafe to its owners. If it is your back yard or water supply that is affected, you have a whole 'nother perspective. But if you can't buy your own Congressman, you don't count.
When it happened again Saturday, she felt terror. This pipeline breach was underneath the Yellowstone River, just a few feet from her sheep pasture. The new spill poured out some 50,000 gallons of crude oil. Leaders of this small riverside farming and ranching community in northeastern Montana warned residents not to drink their tap water, because benzene, a carcinogen, was found in the municipal water system. Oil slicked the river for dozens of miles, almost to the border with North Dakota. Hoff’s property smelled sickeningly like diesel.
“People need to understand this is a very serious thing,” she said. “It impacts everything and everybody downstream.”
Certainly the disaster is far more than just a local issue. As more than 100 emergency workers hacked at thick river ice in a frantic attempt to find and contain the spilled oil, the U.S. Senate in Washington made good on what its new Republican leaders promised would be their first order of business: approving the Keystone XL pipeline, which would also cross the Yellowstone River in Glendive.
“The State Department has affirmed the safety of Keystone XL pipeline,” said freshman Sen. Steve Daines, R-Montana, who was joined in his support by senior Sen. Jon Tester, D-Montana. “It’s important that this job-creating project is approved.”
The Sin of Wages
Little Crappy Ships fail another mission.
In addition to previous problems with corrosion and structural integrity, the imagined interchangeable mission modules don't seem quite up to the mission. In fact the minesweeeping module has been declared a failure.
Mine-detection equipment for the U.S. Navy’s Littoral Combat Ship, including an underwater drone, remains unreliable, the Pentagon’s test office has found.So we have 32 of the Model A Little Crappy Ships in the Navy and 20 of the Model B on order and the Defense Department’s director of operational testing has said that neither model can expect to survive any high intensity combat. Little Crappy (Suicide) Ships.
“Mission modules” to find and clear mines for the initial 32 vessels have “not yet demonstrated sufficient performance to achieve the Navy’s minimal” requirements, Michael Gilmore, the Defense Department’s director of operational testing, said in his annual report to Congress on major weapons systems. It was obtained in advance of its scheduled public release this week.
Lockheed Martin Corp. (LMT), based in Bethesda, Maryland, and Henderson, Australia-based Austal Ltd. (ASB) make different versions of the Littoral Combat Ship. Northrop Grumman Corp. (NOC), based in Falls Church, Virginia, is responsible for its mine-clearing capabilities.
Gilmore’s report may add to the congressional scrutiny of a vessel that some lawmakers are already criticizing. Amid questions about whether the ship could survive in combat, departing Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel last month approved a Navy proposal to buy 20 modified ships after 2019 with improved armor, sensors and weapons following the first 32, which will cost an estimated $23 billion.
The Littoral Combat Ship, designed for shallow coastal waters, is supposed to be outfitted with modules that can be swapped out for missions from mine-clearing to submarine-hunting and surface warfare.
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]