Friday, December 31, 2010
Krugman hopes we all like bananas
Because in his latest column he shows how easily we can slip into banana republic status when those in charge of the budget firmly believe in fiscal anarchy.
As the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities points out, the incoming House majority plans to make changes in the “pay-as-you-go” rules — rules that are supposed to enforce responsible budgeting — that effectively implement Mr. Kyl’s principle. Spending increases will have to be offset, but revenue losses from tax cuts won’t. Oh, and revenue increases, even if they come from the elimination of tax loopholes, won’t count either: any spending increase must be offset by spending cuts elsewhere; it can’t be paid for with additional taxes.As in Nassau County, one of the first governments to enjoy the blessings of fiscal anarchy. And so the race is on between awareness and anarchy for the voters. And anybody who waited and waited for the snow plows last week already knows the price of anarchy.
So if taxes don’t matter, does the incoming majority have a realistic plan to cut spending? Of course not. Republicans say that they want to cut $100 billion in spending, which is itself small change in a $3.6 trillion federal budget. But they also say that defense, Medicare and Social Security — all the big-ticket items — are off the table. So they’re talking about a 20 percent cut in what’s left, which includes things like running the judicial system and operating the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; they have offered no specifics about where the cuts will fall.
How will this all end? I have seen the future, and it’s on Long Island, where I grew up.
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]
Post a Comment