Wednesday, December 18, 2013

Doing good with evil intentions


And leave it to our corporate masters in the pharmaceutical field to find a way to pay a little to get a big return, and pretend they are being charitable to boot.
As drug prices have soared in recent years and insurers have increased co-payments, a new type of charity has blossomed to fill a vital niche — helping patients pay the steep out-of-pocket costs for their medicines.

But the largest of these co-payment assistance charities, the Chronic Disease Fund, is now in turmoil after questions have arisen about its relationship with a pharmaceutical company that is itself under investigation for marketing practices.

The practice is casting a spotlight on what has long been an open secret: The bulk of the contributions to these charities come from the pharmaceutical companies themselves. The foundations not only help hundreds of thousands of patients a year, they also raise drug company sales and profits.

After all, if a patient cannot afford out-of-pocket costs of $5,000 for a $100,000-a-year drug, the drug company gets nothing. But if the manufacturer pays the $5,000, the patient gets the drug and the company receives $95,000 from the patient’s insurance company or Medicare.

The contributions — which also provide tax deductions to drug makers — are legal as long as a company does not require that the money it donates be used exclusively to pay for its own drugs.

But articles circulating in the investment world have suggested that the Chronic Disease Fund might be showing improper favoritism toward Questcor Pharmaceuticals, which sells an expensive drug for immune diseases. Moreover, the articles noted that the charity was purchasing millions of dollars a year in services from for-profit companies owned by the charity’s founder and president, Michael Banigan.
What a sweet deal hiding behind a front of doing good for people in need.

Comments:
It's even worse than that. Let's say that the full amortized expense of creating and manufacturing that $100,000 a year drug is $10,000 a year. Not uncommon for specialized drugs. Questcor then sells it for $100,000/year, with a $90,000/year markup.

But wait. There's close to 20% of Americans who are not insured or do not have a drug plan that will pay for the drug. So 20% of their customers can't buy the drug regardless of whether there is a charity to help with the copays. What to do, what to do...

Oh yeah. DONATE the drug. So let's say they have 1000 customers for the drug, and 200 can't afford the drug. They sell it to 800 customers for 100,000, and make 90,000 profit off each customer, for a total of $72M pure profit. But wait, they have to pay 36% taxes on corporate profits, right? That's a cool $25.92M. Except... there's those 200 customers who can't afford the drug. Give them the drug and take off the full 100,000 as a charitable donation, that's $20M in charitable giving, that actually cost them $2M, but saves them $7.2M on their taxes! Wow, what a deal, it cuts their taxes by 1/3rd while barely taking a digit off of the $72M total profit. Add in all the other things they're allowed to deduct, and you now know how they can be ridiculously profitable while paying little or no taxes.

Deadbeats. Feh.
 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]





<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]